All the people said that Aero is cool and what? How need Aero.

I've been reding this article and benchmark there is very usefull to understand performance in many scenaries.
Cool, dx10 and.... what that thing aren't necesary for people that uses computer productively.

Read conclution.

QUOTE

...my computer perform better in Windows XP. Right now I’m dual booting Windows XP and Vista.

If you really need your PC to finish huge encoding, transcoding or rendering workloads within a defined time frame, yes, it is. Don't do it; stay with XP.


And now see the graphic.

This is Windows XP


This is (fatty) Windows Vista
[img=http://img259.imageshack.us/img259/2105/vistaki9.th.jpg]

If you want to read the full article please click here

You can use Windows Vista if you want to see Aero, but if we talk about performance Windows Vista suck and that's the truth if you don't want to see the truth that's your problem but the truth is the truth.

So what you are saying is use windows 95 cos its smaller and faster than anything that followed it?

_________________
Don't worry Sony, I'll just cancel my date of birth and get a new one.

Nah, W2k pwnt 95 in almost every way




....although not when it was first released as there were about 2 drivers written for it Sound familiar....? XP was better, but no good until SP1 and then pwnt again by MS with SP2 Which improved again with various updates....

_________________

The Pancreas of S.T.F.U. | Never take life too seriously - nobody gets out alive anyway.
Disco_jim: um..... I have no excuse. | Chips: Thank the Beef | Rev Dr: Beef, I think i wee'd a little

screw windows, i'm installing dos 5.2 again

_________________

Linux ftw! I heard that Cybercon was saying he got Ubuntu running steam / css, mind telling us how it was done, would make a nice tutorial for in here u know

_________________


"I wish my lawn was emo, so it would cut itself...."

aye - maxipad does as well - uses Wine on a linux lappy i've had css running in a pc emulator on OSX - it's defo playable but the fps hit is HUGE.

You CANT compare xp and Vista performance wise, its simply not possible, without factoring in alot of stuff, which you dont do.

I would be able to explain further, but your pictures, which is your only argument, is so small, that i cant see what the hell it is.

If you really want to compare it, theres a few tests here the kills yours:
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/ ... page5.html
http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/01/29/ ... page8.html

_________________
Codito Ergo Sum | Even i, who have no clue about social life

/puts on sunglasses

The MS tattoo is still burning fiercly since that post.

_________________

[SNIGG] Sniggerdly | Ask me about how awesome I am at EvE |

I rather XP

Compatablilty.

_________________
Just ownage.

like its been said, give till everyones computers are upgraded and service packs are installed and people won't look back.

_________________

-------------------------------------
-----------Johns=GCHQ=-------------
-------------------------------------

if you put a windows CD in and play it backward it is said to ontain demonic script - even worse if you play it forwards it install windows

_________________

_________________

-------------------------------------
-----------Johns=GCHQ=-------------
-------------------------------------

I hear it sang "giiiiive biiiiiiill allll youuuuurrr moooonneeeeeeeey" to the tune of spirit in the sky, or something

_________________


"I wish my lawn was emo, so it would cut itself...."

_________________

_________________