Gamecommunity =GCHQ= :: View topic

AMD is way too late, sadly.

They ruled the market when they shipped their Athlon 64.
But when Intel came with their Core 2 duo.. Bye AMD.

The question is how AMD's new CPU's does. I dont see them taking too much intel marketshare.
But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again.

But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again.

However, unlike Intel's forthcoming Penryn products, the K10 architecture will still be fabricated on a 65nm process. According to AMD, this is because the total amount of cache on the processors will be lower than that on Intel's processors, freeing up enough room to fit a 65nm quad-core CPU in a single package.

Chadk=GCHQ= wrote:

But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again.

I don't doubt that you're probably right w.r.t. to desktop market share, but try reading the article properly!

Quote:

The main reason for switching to a smaller process is to fit more onto a wafer, not to invoke magical hobbit 733tness

Still, a lot of Intel's performance does come from large caches - to compensate for a lack of an IMC.

Noooo

AMD has always been the gamers favourite.....just shows how much things can change in the computer hardware world.

Noooo

AMD has always been the gamers favourite.....just shows how much things can change in the computer hardware world.

Author:	[QBS]Dr.Strangelove [ Sun Apr 15, 2007 9:58 pm ]
Post subject:	AMD quad core CPUs
tease me

Author:	Chadk [ Sun Apr 15, 2007 10:59 pm ]
Post subject:
AMD is way too late, sadly. They ruled the market when they shipped their Athlon 64. But when Intel came with their Core 2 duo.. Bye AMD. The question is how AMD's new CPU's does. I dont see them taking too much intel marketshare. But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again.

Author:	simon [ Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:25 pm ]
Post subject:
Chadk=GCHQ= wrote: AMD is way too late, sadly. They ruled the market when they shipped their Athlon 64. But when Intel came with their Core 2 duo.. Bye AMD. The question is how AMD's new CPU's does. I dont see them taking too much intel marketshare. But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again. Was reading about that earlier funnily enough. But yeah, they'll probibally give AMD another run for their money in the market. I'm happy to buy Intel CPUs now concidering they made their CPU prices reasonable.

Author:	LeBeourfCurtaine [ Sun Apr 15, 2007 11:25 pm ]
Post subject:
Chadk=GCHQ= wrote: But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again. I don't doubt that you're probably right w.r.t. to desktop market share, but try reading the article properly! Quote: However, unlike Intel's forthcoming Penryn products, the K10 architecture will still be fabricated on a 65nm process. According to AMD, this is because the total amount of cache on the processors will be lower than that on Intel's processors, freeing up enough room to fit a 65nm quad-core CPU in a single package. The main reason for switching to a smaller process is to fit more onto a wafer, not to invoke magical hobbit 733tness Still, a lot of Intel's performance does come from large caches - to compensate for a lack of an IMC.

Author:	Chadk [ Mon Apr 16, 2007 7:34 am ]
Post subject:
LeBeourfCurtaine wrote: Chadk=GCHQ= wrote: But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again. I don't doubt that you're probably right w.r.t. to desktop market share, but try reading the article properly! Quote: However, unlike Intel's forthcoming Penryn products, the K10 architecture will still be fabricated on a 65nm process. According to AMD, this is because the total amount of cache on the processors will be lower than that on Intel's processors, freeing up enough room to fit a 65nm quad-core CPU in a single package. The main reason for switching to a smaller process is to fit more onto a wafer, not to invoke magical hobbit 733tness Still, a lot of Intel's performance does come from large caches - to compensate for a lack of an IMC. But intel uses High-K dielectrics for their chips = win win win.. Factor 10 less leakage, and better Capactiance. And 45nm will allow the price to be lower, compared to the old technologies, because of that it fits better on a wafer, for instance. I used to be an AMD fan. But intel is way better. And intel got Wide Dynamic Execution

Gamecommunity =GCHQ= http://82.148.227.125:8080/

AMD quad core CPUs http://82.148.227.125:8080/viewtopic.php?f=122&t=40279	Page 1 of 1

Author:	Caspius=GCHQ= [ Sat Apr 21, 2007 11:55 am ]
Post subject:
Chadk=GCHQ= wrote: AMD is way too late, sadly. They ruled the market when they shipped their Athlon 64. But when Intel came with their Core 2 duo.. Bye AMD. The question is how AMD's new CPU's does. I dont see them taking too much intel marketshare. But i think that again when intel ships the 45nm cpu's, AMD is gonna be the small ones again. Without AMD intel would have a virtually full monopoly on the Market, which would mean high prices and slower release dates. I bet we'd be at least a couple of years behind where we are now. AMD have made bit of a loss recently though which is not good news though... http://www.tomshardware.co.uk/2007/04/19/amd_reports_611_million_loss/

Author:	Seric=GCHQ= [ Sat Apr 21, 2007 3:18 pm ]
Post subject:
Noooo AMD has always been the gamers favourite.....just shows how much things can change in the computer hardware world.

Author:	Extolerance=GCHQ= [ Sat Apr 21, 2007 3:32 pm ]
Post subject:
Seric=GCHQ= wrote: Noooo AMD has always been the gamers favourite.....just shows how much things can change in the computer hardware world. AMD will be back, don't worry.

Author:	LeBeourfCurtaine [ Sat Apr 21, 2007 6:41 pm ]
Post subject:
Just remember that their chips are cheaper

Author:	happyslappy [ Wed Apr 25, 2007 6:35 pm ]
Post subject:	nope
Quote: Noooo AMD has always been the gamers favourite.....just shows how much things can change in the computer hardware world. wrong amd used to suck, k6 k62 kg3 all owned by intel for fps its just the natural cycle intel then amd then intel then amd etc etc

Page 1 of 1	All times are UTC [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/